April 4
“May I use your microscope?” he asked.
“By all means,” I said with a gesture of elaborate politeness.
He sat down at my table, in my chair, and used my instrument—becoming at once absorbed and oblivious to my banter as per below:
“As Scotchmen,” I said, “are monuments rather than men, this latest raid on Edinboro’s worthy inhabitants must be called vandalism rather than murder.”
No answer. I continued to stand by my chair.
“How pleased Swift, Johnson, Lamb, and other anti-Caledonians would be. …”
“Hope you don’t mind my occupying your chair a little longer,” the Scotchman said, “but this is a larva, has curious maxillae. …” and his voice faded away in abstraction.
“Oh! no—go on,” I said, “I fear it is a grievous absence of hospitality on my part in not providing you with a glass of whiskey. Can I offer you water, Sir?”
No answer.
Another enthusiast ushered himself in, was greeted with delight by the first and invited to sit down. I pulled out a chair for him and said:
“Shave, sir, or hair cut?”
“If you follow along to the top of the galea,” No. I droned on imperturbably, “you will. …” etc.
I got tired of standing and talking to an empty house but at last they got up, apologising and making for the door.
I entreated them not to mention the matter—my fee should be nominal—I did it out of sheer love, etc.
They thanked me again and would have said more but I added blandly:
“You know your way out?” They assured me they did (having worked in the place for 30 years and more)—I thanked God—and sat down to my table once more.
(These reports of conversations are rather fatuous: yet they give an idea of the sort of person I have to deal with, and also the sort of person I am among this sort of person.)