June 7
My ironical fate lured me this evening into another discussion on marriage in which I had to take up a position exactly opposite to the one I defended yesterday against R⸺. In fact, I actually subverted to my own pressing requirements some of R⸺’s own arguments! The argument, of course, was with Her.
Marriage, I urged, was an economic trap for guileless young men, and for my part (to give myself some necessary stiffening) I did not intend to enter upon any such hazardous course, even if I had the chance. Miss ⸻ said I was a funk—to me who the day before had been hammering into R⸺ my principle of “Plunge and damn the consequences.” I was informed I was an old woman afraid to go out without an umbrella, an old tabby cat afraid to leave the kitchen fire, etc., etc.
“Yes, I am afraid to go out without an umbrella,” I argued formally, “when it’s raining cats and dogs. As long as I am dry, I shall keep dry. As soon as I find myself caught in the rain or victimised by a passion, I shan’t be afraid of falling in love or getting wet. It would be a misadventure, but I am not going in search of one.”
All the same the discussion was very galling, for I was acting a part.
… The truth is I have philandered abominably with her. I know it. And now I am jibbing at the idea of marriage. … I am such an egotist, I want, I believe, a Princess of the Blood Royal.